Chattanooga’s Cefar® TENS is our next generation of handheld TENS device, building on the established technology
of the Primo Pro with added features to combine TENS and NMES treatments in one portable unit.
Intended for use by both healthcare professionals and patients, the Cefar® TENS combines TENS with NMES to bring pain
relief and muscle rehabilitation from the clinic to the home. Patients can begin treatment with the device in a
clinical environment under the supervision of a healthcare professional, before continuing their rehabilitation
in the comfort of their own home. Simple and easy to use, with a range of compliance features, patients can
be confident about taking their treatment into their own hands while their clinician can easily set
parameters and monitor their progress.
For healthcare professionals this equals faster recovery times and shorter stays for patients,
less pressure on resources, and less use of analgesics, therefore patients can benefit from reduced pain,
increased mobility, and greater independence.
Altogether, Cefar® TENS is more than just a pain machine.
- – Symptomatic relief and management of chronic, intractable pain
- – Adjunctive treatment for post-surgical and post-trauma acute pain
- – Relief of pain associated with arthritis
- – Retarding or preventing disuse atrophy
- – Maintaining or increasing range of motion
- – Re-educating muscles
- – Increasing local blood circulation
The Cefar® TENS stimulator features 2 independent channels that can be managed separately. Users can
select either the same program on both channels, or 2 different programs to be used simultaneously,
allowing a combination of NMES and TENS in one treatment. This means patients can rehabilitate
the affected area while reducing the associated pain, resulting in a more comfortable and effective treatment.
The device allows users to create up to 5 custom programs and to select specific parameters.
This gives clinicians the ability to prescribe an initial treatment regime that patients can be confident in using,
while still allowing room for future modification.
For best results when using the Cefar® TENS, we recommend the use of Chattanooga electrodes.
Available in 2 different sizes, our electrodes provide excellent conductivity and ensure comfortable and effective treatment.
Clinicians can easily keep track of patients’ home treatments by monitoring how many hours of usage since the device was reset, along with total device usage.
The device also features a locking function to ensure the patient will only use the appropriate program.
When connected to acupuncture needles, Cefar® TENS can be used to deliver electroacupuncture (EA) treatment. As EA has been shown to be particularly effective in the reduction of pain, this provides a further, more beneficial option for patients to reduce their discomfort.
*Clinician use only. Acupuncture needles not supplied.
Rotatable belt clip
When connected to the belt clip, the device can be rotated to allow convenient access to the cable outputs.
1. Gatewood CT, et al., The efficacy of post-operative devices following knee arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Feb;25(2):501-516.
2. Rakel B, Frantz R, Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative pain with movement.
The Journal of Pain, Vol 4, No 8 (October), 2003: pp 455-464
3. Johnson MI, Jones G, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: current status of evidence. Painmanag (2017)7(1) 4.
Johnson MI, et al., Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015 issue 6
5. Sbruzzi G, et al., Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after thoracic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
of 11 randomized trials. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2012 Jan-Mar;27(1):75-87.
6. Osiri M, et al., Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for knee osteoarthritis. The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 2
7. Bjordal JM, et al., Short-term efficacy of physical interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain. A systematic review and meta-
analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007, 8:51
8. Gould N, Donnermeyer D et .al., Transcutaneous Muscle Stimulation as a Method to Retard Disuse. Clin Orthop Rel Res, 178:190–197, 1983
9. Labanca L, et al., Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Superimposed on Movement Early after ACL Surgery.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Mar;50(3):407-416.
10. Topp R, et al., The Effect of Prehabilitation Exercise on Strength and Functioning After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Volume 1, pp. 729-735
11. Broderick BJ, et al., Haemodynamic performance of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) during recovery
from total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Mar 5;8(1):3.
12. Sangdee C, et al., Electroacupuncture versus Diclofenac in symptomatic treatment of Osteoarthritis of the knee:
a randomized controlled trial. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2002, 2:3